'Top Form Old Bean'
I was going to do a post about the differences between good manners and etiquette, but after a while I found myself distracted by a bigger question. [All I wanted to prove was that wearing my usual attire of a baseball cap, hoody, trainers and combats into a 'posh' restaurant was not in fact bad manners, but purely bad etiquette. Etiquette that is based on outdated Edwardian and Victorian customs [But originally Roman], that we're used to suppress the masses and stimulate elitism within the higher echelons of society. Therefore having not a single shred of relevance in today's modern 'Individual' society... ergo... 'NO' I'm not taking my fcukin cap off.]
But then I got to thinking... Why do I wear what I wear?
I'd like to think, as I guess all of us would, that what we choose to wear is a directed reflection of our own individual personality, but alas I know this can't be true. How can it be when someone else designed whatever it is we're wearing. It can only be the case that we choose an image based on what 'we've been told' reflects a portrait of ourselves.
So what's going on? [Apart from the obvious advantage that I'm no longer allowed to be dragged around 'Bluewater' shopping]. Well the truth is I don't really know... :-/
Someone has decided what I should wear, so if I'm not being repressed by ancient etiquette, I'm being dictated to by some nameless modern fashion designer... [The obvious Irony here being my modern 'hooded uniform' might costs vastly more than the average etiquette suit...]
But the BIG question is why any of us feel the need to wear a particular 'Uniform' at all? Obviously taking into consideration not wearing one says as much about you as doing so does. So who's judging who here and why does it matter? Please assist :-)
Help Help I'm being repressed... Think I better book myself onto a sewing course... ;-)
Have a good weekend People :-)
Ciao Ciao
Confused from Chichester
I BLOG There4 I am
For J. the snob-babe :-)
5Comments:
Lol...no Bluewater is a positive plus..... hell, that place is the worst of all it's ilk!
This is not about choice, it is about the opposite, lack of choice. The ettiquette thing stinks....don't ask how often I have been refused entry or service not because of my manners or behaviour but because I wore leathers. Manners are consideration, conformity and etiquette are about fear, the human animal has in it's psych a horror of being 'different' and often not the confidence to stand alone.......oh and the large design houses have manipulated that very insecurity for years. Gah.
OK Gem - start with the bit about you in leathers. It is not the leather they object to. They may well have scars from previous occasions when someone in leather caused them a problem. They now associate leather with aggro and exercise their right to treat the leather wearer differently. General attitude is to be uncomfortable with anything different. What harm does a naked rambler really do? Etiquette has been defined as "The practices and forms prescribed by social convention or by authority" and that means that those who choose to dismiss convention are regarded with suspicion. Nothing wrong in being unconventional, nothing wrong in being out of ordinary. Just remember, both have a price.
baseball caps are worn by Chav's, pikey's and muggers.
John: People compartmentalise others by there appearance. These compartments being instigated and perpetuated by the media, the state and society. It allows them to categorise individuals and ‘understand’ who people are without the need to even get to know them, to pre-judge them. But why? Haven’t we in society moved beyond the failings of conceptual stereotyping? Can’t we just think for ourselves?
Just another form of control...
Stig: And Baseball players...
Gem: Leathers? We talking Bike Leathers here or something else? OK maybe don't answer that :-)
Post a Comment
<< Home